Eoin Treacy's view -
First take all cash spent on buybacks, subtract all cash raised from issuance, plus all cash spent on dividends. Then divide by current market cap for a “yield.” (net bb + divs))/market cap
Same as above, but now include net debt issuance/reduction, where companies paying down debt in addition to dividends and buybacks are ranked more favorably. (net bb + divs + net debt reduction)/market cap
We will call the first “shareholder yield” and the second “stakeholder yield” because debt is part of the equation. For these purposes, I am excluding financial stocks, because they use of debt is so much different from other sectors. In practice, you’d want to make sector specific adjustments to measurements of debt, but here I am just keeping things pretty simple.
Now let’s run at typical test of the returns for stocks in the top decile by these two yield factors. Both have been strong selection factors. Here is the rolling 3-year excess return earned since the late 1980’s by the highest “yielding” stocks.
Across the entire period, Stakeholder yield has delivered a return of 14.5%, and Shareholder yield a return of 12.4%. This means that investors have been rewarded more by buying stocks which are both paying back shareholders AND reducing their debt. But that script has flipped somewhat after the global financial crisis, arguably because interest rates have been so low. Companies taking advantage of cheap money in recent years seem to have had an edge.
Share buybacks have made a lot more headlines over the last couple of years than I remember them making before the credit crisis. This is despite the fact their weighting as a percentage of total market cap was higher than now. Some of the reasons for this include the fact that ETFs tracking buybacks are now available but also because so much debt has been issued at ultra-low rates to buy back shares.
This section continues in the Subscriber's Area. Back to top