Denmark introduced negative rates in 2012 as investors seeking refuge from Europe’s debt crisis piled into AAA-rated krone assets, threatening to destabilize the country’s euro peg. Back then, when Nodgaard was head of the Financial Supervisory Authority, he said negative rates were unlikely to hurt banks since lower impairments would offset a decline in interest income.
But no one expected negative rates to last this long. While banks initially benefited from lower impairments and inflated asset prices, their business models are struggling to withstand persistently low rates.
Last year Denmark’s banking and mortgage industry reported its lowest operating profit in at least five years, while return on equity hit a three-year low. Some banks are now looking into passing on the cost of negative rates to retail customers, broaching a subject that was once considered taboo.
The interest rate on current-account deposits at the central bank and the amount that lenders can place there are among a handful of levers that the central bank uses to maintain the krone’s peg to the euro.
The central bank has raised its current-account limit before, most notably back in 2015 when Switzerland’s decision to send its franc into a free float fanned speculation Denmark would be next. Back then, the Danish central bank raised its current account limit to 174 billion kroner.
Ben Bernanke’s fateful words “Deflation, making sure it doesn’t happen here” must be ringing through the halls of central banks the world over as $15 trillion in negative yielding bonds are pricing in a deflationary spiral the like of which the world has seldom seen. What Denmark’s experience with negative rates tells us is that traditional banking is doomed without some form of exaggerated assistance from the government. Perhaps more importantly, once accepted negative rates seem like a hard habit to kick.Click HERE to subscribe to Fuller Treacy Money Back to top