How McGuinty's windmill dreams became a nightmare
Comment of the Day

January 18 2011

Commentary by David Fuller

How McGuinty's windmill dreams became a nightmare

My thanks to a subscriber for this informative item by Thomas Walkom for thestar.com. Here is the opening:
When Dalton McGuinty embraced wind power four years ago, it seemed he couldn't lose.

Politically, his support for this infinitely renewable form of energy put the Ontario premier firmly on the side of the environmental angels.

Even more important, McGuinty's Liberals pitched their commitment to wind as part of a comprehensive, green industrial strategy.

The government would not merely use wind turbines to generate electricity. It would also subsidize firms to build the giant machines for export.

In effect, windmills would be to the new Ontario what autos were to the old - the province's economic driver.

Critics of the premier's ambitious schemes were dismissed as cranks and nutters infected with a not-in-my-backyard syndrome.

To ensure that these self-seekers and know-nothings didn't interfere with the government's bold plans, Queen's Park stripped municipal councils of their power to regulate wind turbines.

On paper, the plan seemed a sure winner.

But that was before Dr. Bob McMurtry.

And:

But being a scientific sort of chap, McMurtry began by researching the issue.

What he discovered alarmed him. In particular, he ran into evidence - re-enforced by personal encounters later - that low-frequency humming associated with wind turbines may lead to chronic sleeplessness, stress and even hypertension causing heart disease for anyone living within two kilometres of a machine.

What alarmed him more was that the provincial government did not even monitor this low-frequency noise. As well, under Ontario rules, giant windmills need be no more than 550 metres from any residence.

So in 2009, he made the not terribly radical suggestion that Queen's Park conduct a proper, arms-length study on the health effects of industrial wind turbines before authorizing any more.

Failing that, he said, it should insist that new turbines be set at least two kilometres away from any dwelling.

The wind industry was outraged. Fearful of being enmeshed in red tape, wind power firms argued strongly against such a study. Their case was bolstered last May after provincial medical officer of health Dr. Arlene King issued a report saying no scientific evidence exists to show that wind turbines harm human health.

McMurtry countered that this is because no one has ever conducted a proper study - which is why he wants one.

David Fuller's view Windmills are very noisy, I discovered when walking within a mile of one last October. I think Dr McMurtry and others should insist on a proper study. I certainly would not want to live anywhere near a windmill, or those big overhead power lines which one can encounter in the UK and Continental European countryside.

Back to top